Regulatory agenda

“Don’t tell me what you value. Show me your budget — and I’ll tell you what you value.”  — Joe Biden

The Biden administration’s FY 2024 Budget proposal is out, and although the Republicans are declaring it dead-on-arrival, it’s useful as a starting point and to see where the administration’s head is at.

According to the budget summary,

Workers power America’s economic prosperity, and to ensure workers are treated with dignity and respect in the workplace, the Budget invests $2.3 billion, an increase of $430 million above the 2023 enacted level, in the Department’s worker protection agencies. The Budget would enable DOL to protect workers’ wages and benefits, combat exploitative child labor, address the misclassification of workers as independent contractors, and improve workplace health and safety

Overall Big Increase

OSHA’s budget is tiny. The current FY 2023 budget is a paltry $632 million out of a $6.9 trillion budget. My calculator doesn’t have enough space to try to calculate what OSHA’s budget is as a percent of the federal budget. Also, just to add some perspective, EPA’s budget is close to $10 billion.

Biden’s budget proposes to increase the total OSHA budget by 17% (and 432 new full-time employees), with increases distributed as follows:

FY24 Proposed Increase over FY23


Standards: Big Budget Proposal and Big Disappointment

The biggest increase would go into the Standards and Guidance Budget.  And they need it. At the end of the Obama administration, the Standards budget was only $20 million, and Trump cut it 10% to $18 million. Only last year did it get slightly above $20 million again.

According to the Budget in Brief, “OSHA is planning to publish two final rules and six proposed rules.  Proposed rules are issued following OMB review and are followed by public hearings.  The final rules generally take at least a couple of years after the proposal is issued. The highest priorities among the rulemaking projects, according to OSHA , are Heat Illness Prevention, Prevention of Work Place Violence in Healthcare and Social Assistance, Tree Care, Emergency Response, and Walking Working Surfaces. Notably missing from this list the the comprehensive infectious disease standard and the Process Safety Management Standard which OSHA began working on after the West Texas fertilizer plant explosion in 2013.

It’s not clear which are the proposed and which are the final rules. None of the big ones (e.g. Heat or Workplace Violence) will be final and may not even reach a proposal. The Walking Working Surfaces is simply a clarification of the standard issued in 2016. Tree Care and Emergency response are also relatively small and have gone through the Small Business review (SBREFA). We may see proposals on those, but it’s unlikely they’ll be final.  OSHA is also working on a number of small standards which could be counted in the mix, such as the walkaround rule, shipyard scaffolding, silica standard revisions, blood lead, addressing computer-controlled lockout-tagout and likely some whistleblower regs.

When this Presidential term ends, this administration will have issued no major standards.

The standards situation has been a major disappointment in this administration. Note that FY 24 ends a month before the 2024 Presidential election, so this is the full last budget of Biden’s first term. If (God forbid), Republicans take the White House in 2024, it is unlikely that any of the major standards (such as heat, workplace violence, infectious diseases or PSM) will make any progress and some may disappear from the Regulatory Agenda in a Trump or DeSantis administration — even if they’ve reached the proposal stage. As I’ve lamented before, aside from the COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard and the ill-fated ‘test or vaccinate’ standard, when this term ends, this administration will have issued no major standards.

Everything Else

Enforcement also gets a substantial 16% increase which would include an additional 142 inspectors.  OSHA’s Whistleblower Program which administers 25 different whistleblower laws would get a $5,640,000 (30%) increase and 55 additional employees.

State plans are likely to be disappointed with the 6% proposed increase which doesn’t even meet the the inflation rate.

One of the bigger increases (30%) goes to Federal Compliance Assistance. The main bulk of the increase ($10.7 million) goes to hiring staff train the influx of new compliance officers and whistleblower investigators from both Federal OSHA and State Plans.

Another large chunk ($8.8 million) goes to hiring 59 new outreach and compliance assistance staff

to expand the agency’s outreach to vulnerable workers.  “This includes 54 new Compliance Assistance Specialists, and five Labor, Worker, and Family Liaisons to amplify outreach to organizations, employers, and workers in marginalized communities and high-hazard industries, including construction, grain handling, healthcare, and those that employ temporary, migrant, and underserved workers.

The State Compliance Assistance line gets a rather paltry 2% increase. This is the Onsite Consultation Program for small and medium size businesses. I would have thought, given that we have Republican House, that the Administration would have gone bigger in this area, although maybe they just want to let the House plus that up in return for increases in other areas?

And Harwood Grants get a $1 million increase. House Republicans will undoubtedly attempt to zero out the program as they generally do when they’re in control.


Mine Safety and Health Administration

MSHA would receive a 13% increase to increase enforcement and work on protecting workers from silica dust.  MSHA is working on an updated silica standard, but no proposal has seen the light of day and they make nor predictions for a final. According to the regulatory agenda, an MSHA silica proposal will be issued next month, but no one actually expects that to happen.


National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NIOSH, ” the only dedicated federal investment for the research needed to prevent work-related injuries and illnesses among the nation’s 161 million workers” will be the beneficiary of a 2% cut in its budget. Unclear where that cut is located, or why.

What’s Next?

We have a long and likely depressing way to go before we get a final budget. First, this summer will see a brobdingnagian battle over the debt limit, which if the Republicans agree to take Medicare and Social Security off the table, would mean a 70% cut in all other government programs in order to reach a balanced budget in 10 years. We’ll see how that goes.

Then, if the worlds’ economies survive that, there will a huge battle over the FY2024 budget. The Republican House will undoubtedly look for major cuts — especially in their favorite agencies like OSHA, while the Democratic Senate will seek increases  — hopefully significant increases, but I’m not holding my breath on that, given their record over the past couple of budget cycles. And by the time the real fight starts of passing the FY 2024 budget, we’ll be deep into the 2024 Presidential race.


Biden FY 2024 request (Thousands of dollars)

FY 2023 FinalFY 2024 ProposalIncrease over FY 2023% Change from 2023 Final
Safety and Health Standards$20,100$31,214$11,11455%
Federal Enforcement$246,243$$286,489$40,24616%
Whistleblower Protection$22,500$29,158$6,65830%
State Enforcement$120,000$127,115$7,1156%
Technical Support$25,675$30,623$4,94819%
Federal Compliance Assistance$77,762$10,1073$23,31130%
State Compliance Assistance$62,661$64,160$1,4992%
Training Grants$12,787$13,787$1,0008%
Safety and Health Statistics$34,750$43,896$9,14626%
Executive Administration$9,831$11,213$1,38214%
Mine Safety and Health Administration$387,876$438,094$50,27813%
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health$351,800$345,000-$6,800-2%
10 thoughts on “Biden’s FY 2024 Workplace Safety and Health Budget”
  1. The following statements are not a knock on some of the fine people who have worked at OSHA over the years. I, myself, did many years ago. OSHA has been left in the dust by safety and health professionals and the companies that employ them. I don’t care how much money OSHA got this year, its impact has faded and I doubt it will ever get back its mojo. When companies were focused on compliance, OSHA was part of the daily language in industry. We have learned that compliance is only small part of the big picture of managing safety and health and in no way guarantees a safe workplace. Complying with the OSHA standards is not always the best investment in terms of overall risk reduction. As a safety pro who chose to be in the trenches much of his career, I’ve had to morph from technical safety expert to a jack of all trades who can assist in all areas of the business. I write operational procedures, develop PM’s, purchase equipment. The best ROI in risk reduction often involves things for which there is no OSHA standard nor ever will be, regardless of what party is in power. Those who believe that politics is what is holding us back in safety need to quit their desk jobs and come work in a grossly outdated manufacturing facility of today to see that how far removed we are from these political debates. When the writing was on the wall years ago not to hold our breath waiting for OSHA standards, the safety pro community developed our own. Many companies today have excellent standards that far exceed anything OSHA could ever dream of. I find senior leaders of companies today to be much more progressive than in the past in terms of how they view risk and their understanding of the importance of culture. We have huge lists of corrective actions, most of which don’t trace back to an OSHA standard. The threat of OSHA worked in the past, but industry has moved beyond that. Such threats don’t give us people in the trenches a hammer like it did 30 years ago. In fact, many leaders today get offended when you throw the OSHA threat in their face because leaders are more progressive and know what needs to be done. The challenge is finding the resources. Early in my career, I would come to leaders and show them 1910 and say “we need to do this.” Now I have leaders overwhelming me with things they want done to improve safety. I used to say I wanted more educated leaders. Be careful what you ask for LOL. OSHA’s lack of standards and CSHO’s has never held me back. What has held me back is a lack of hours in the day and, earlier in my career, a lack of appreciation for the importance of personal relationships in a work environment. The real problem today is that some corporate leaders do not understand the breadth of the safety pro role or they choose not to acknowledge it. We lack resources. But so does every other function, so we cannot complain. If OSHA could magically make an ergonomic standard and 100 new CSHO’s appear today it would have little to no impact in 99.99% of industry. Many companies got smart and are already working on ergonomics. They don’t need standards or threats. If my plant manager could get $100k tomorrow he would instantly issue PO’s for things he and I have talked about on many occasions. I bet many safety pros would say the same. OSHA’s threat of fines will NEVER outweigh the need for “shareholder value,” I don’t care who is in power. Anyone who thinks it will is delusional. In my 30+ years in the field I’ve never had a discussion with contemporaries over how Republicans are making my job impossible. I’m not saying politics is not important. They are. But in terms of day-to-day risk decisions that can cause disasters…those decisions are being made by people of every race creed and political party. My facility had a serious incident this week that ultimately came down to an individual supervisor’s choice to run a line. If the plant had blown up, some people would be claiming “corporate greed” and politics was behind it. And that would be the furthest thing from the truth. It was complacency at play. An OSHA standard or threat will not combat that. No doubt some disasters have root causes associated with “greedy” decisions ie cutting back on maintenance. My point is that we should have the facts about incidents before pointing fingers and assuming they could have been avoided if OSHA was stronger or another political party was in power. I find those facts and details are often missing. We had not even cleaned up the chemicals from the recent train derailment and some are jumping up and down pointing the finger. Safety 101…get the facts and let the investigation play out and do not skew the investigation with one’s predisposed beliefs. And don’t cite hearsay. Such behavior reflects poorly upon us a safety profession. Possibly that’s a reflection of a disconnect between OSHA and those in political positions and those of us in the field.

  2. Hey there Jordan. Thanks for everything you do. What’s the latest on Harwood and other OSHA budget issues now that the initial positions on the budget have been established by both parties?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Confined Space

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading